60.response_n_review

回复审稿意见与参与审稿 §

回复审稿意见 §

要点 §

•Precise about where the change is made. Explain exactly what is changed to what at where. 用最简洁的方式解释问题，思考回答时要回答的核心内容。回答时提到的内容要么在论文正文中出现过，要么是修改论文时已经添加到正文中。只回答问题直接提到的内容，不需要做额外的解释。 •The response should be self-contained: reviewer does not need to go back to the paper to check for data •Separate unrelated questions: reviewer may have multiple questions in one bullet point, separate them.

• 回答问题时保持格式一致：
  • 不需要Response:/Response to reviewer:，使用不同字体格式将回答加以区分即可
  • editor/reviewer提出的意见以数字序号标识
  • 回答时若提到章节，都需要具体标注章节号及章节标题，如Section III. (methodology)
  • 时态的统一：可以统一使用过去式：we edited, we added, …

开头范例 §

We thank the editor and all reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions. In the following, we address those comments one by one and indicate the corresponding revisions we made in the manuscript. We hope that the revision greatly improves the quality of the manuscript as required by the editor and reviewers.

Statement of changes §

• 要点
  • 动词以过去式放在句子开头，如Added a couple of sentences about potential applications

参与审稿 §

• 参考用时时长：一般8页论文控制在两小时以内，期刊长论文2~4小时

• 审稿要求

  • 论文有什么贡献？What is the contribution of the paper?
  • 作者是否解释了论文的重要性？Does the author explain the significance of this paper?
  • 论文的写作是否清晰？结构是否合理？Is the paper clearly written and well organized?
  • 引言部分是否很好的陈述了论文的目的？Does the introduction state the purpose of the paper?
  • 引用文献是否相关且全面？指出缺失的引用文献。Are the references relevant and complete? Supply missing references.
  • 如果论文在技术上存在问题，缺陷是什么？If the paper is not technially sound, what are the deficiencies?

• 对论文的评论要尽可能具体

  • the result are already known, please give references to earlier papers which contain these or similar results.
  • If you say that the reasoning is incorrect or vague, please indicate specifically where and why.
  • . If you suggest that the paper be rewritten, give specific suggestions as to which parts of the paper should be deleted, amplified or modified, and please indicate how.

• 从几个方面评价一篇论文

  • Technical quality*
  • Originality*
  • Thoroughness of results*
  • Clarity of presentation*
  • Adequacy of citation*
  • Relevance to field*

• 写review时

  • 用一般过去式
  • 先表述提到的观点/方法等，好或者不好
  • 句式：The paper should